Cognitivist Vs Non-cognitivist Explanations of the Belief- like and Desire-like Features of Evaluative Judgement

نویسنده

  • Michael Smith
چکیده

When an agent judges her performance of some action to be desirable she thereby conveys her assessment of the importance of acting in the way in question, an assessment in which she might have more or less confidence and for which she might have more or less justification (Brink 1989). To this extent an agent's evaluative judgements seem to express her beliefs. At the same time, an agent's assessment of the importance of acting in a certain way seems to correlate in a fairly robust way with her motivational potential, at least in so far as she is rational (Hare 1952). No desire to (say) do whatever she happens to value doing seems needed to lead a rational subject who judges it desirable to act in a certain way to be motivated to act in that way, and, indeed, to be more motivated to do that which judges more desirable and less motivated to do what she judges less desirable. To this extent, an agent's evaluative judgements seem to express her desires.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Stephen Grant

This article examines recent developments in cognitivist theories of the emotions, and seeks to develop an original theory within that approach. The article specifically considers the criticism that such theories over-intellectualise emotions by reducing them to attitudes towards propositions and by excluding feelings. I argue that few cognitivists have ever held the former position, and that i...

متن کامل

How to be a Cognitivist about Practical Reason

Cognitivism about practical reason is the view that intentions involve beliefs, and that the rational requirements on intentions can be explained in terms of the rational requirements on the beliefs that figure in intentions. In particular, cognitivists about practical reason have sought to provide cognitive explanations of two basic requirements of practical rationality: a consistency requirem...

متن کامل

Exploring Cognitivist and Emotivist Positions of Musical Emotion Using Neural Network Models

There are two positions in the classic debate regarding musical emotion: the cognitivist position and the emotivist position. According to the cognitivist position, music expresses emotion but does not induce it in listeners. So, listeners may recognize emotion in music without feeling it, unlike real, everyday emotion. According to the emotivist position, listeners not only recognize emotion b...

متن کامل

Logic and Semantics for Imperatives

In this paper I will develop a view about the semantics of imperatives, which I term Modal Noncognitivism, on which imperatives might be said to have truth conditions (dispositionally, anyway), but on which it does not make sense to see them as expressing propositions (hence does not make sense to ascribe to them truth or falsity). This view stands against “Cognitivist” accounts of the semantic...

متن کامل

Beyond Epistcmology: Nietzsche and the Need for Epistemic Criteria

In a recent paper, "Nietzsche's Sting And The Possibility of Good Philology/1 Kenneth Wcstphal presents a case for interpreting as strongly cognitivist a number of Nietzsche's remarks concerning truth, language and the world. The cognitivism Wcstphal attributes to Nietzsche is at bottom a correspondence theory of truth: that there arc truths about the world that can be known and expressed, trut...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003